<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Dmarc on iSquiz.com</title><link>https://www.isquiz.com/tags/dmarc/</link><description>Recent content in Dmarc on iSquiz.com</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>iSquiz.com</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.isquiz.com/tags/dmarc/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>DMARC Rollout: p=none to p=reject Without Losing Mail</title><link>https://www.isquiz.com/post/dmarc-policy-rollout-small-business/</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.isquiz.com/post/dmarc-policy-rollout-small-business/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;The fastest way for a small business to lose its own email in a DMARC policy rollout is to jump straight to p=reject. Under reject, messages that fail DMARC are &lt;a href="https://knowledge.workspace.google.com/admin/security/recommended-dmarc-rollout"&gt;rejected by receiving servers and never delivered&lt;/a&gt;. That includes the invoices from a billing tool nobody set up DKIM for.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A staged move from none to quarantine to reject, using the pct= tag and the daily aggregate reports, gets a domain to full enforcement without dropping mail you meant to send.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>